ChatGPT Canvas can help you do many things, such as writing documents and creating code. But how does he compare to Claude Artifact? When choosing an AI tool that suits your needs, choosing between models like Claude Artifact and ChatGPT Canvas can be confusing. Each offers different features that meet specific goals, whether you're looking to generate creative text or use interfaces designed to enhance your experience with AI. Here we'll take a look at each of these models, and compare their advantages and disadvantages, so you can make a better decision based on your personal and professional needs. Check out our comparison between Claude and ChatGPT: Which LLM is Best for Everyday Tasks?
1. Writing
After I asked ChatGPT Canvas to write an article explaining a rye bread recipe, I had multiple editing options. I can choose my reading level, add emojis, and even change sentence length. You can use the form to highlight specific parts of the document that you want to edit.
While I much prefer Claude's interface, Artifact was limited in helping me edit the article I wrote. I could type what I wanted to edit, but I didn't have as many controls as ChatGPT Canvas. For this reason, I give ChatGPT Canvas the win here.
In addition to writing, you can do many other things with ChatGPT. For example, you may want to use the tool to translate different languages.
winner: ChatGPT Canvas
2. Generate code
After trying out Claude Artifact and ChatGPT Canvas for writing, I next wanted to see how they performed with code. I wanted to create a simple script that anyone could use in the headings section of a website. Using ChatGPT Canvas, I was able to fix errors, add logs and comments, and port it to JavaScript, Python, and other programming languages.
When I ran the same experiment at Claude, I decided to make the code applicable to a specific programming language (in this case, JavaScript). While it was annoying to have to select all of the text and enter a new prompt, the results were decent.
However, I'm giving ChatGPT Canvas the win here because it offers an interface that's much easier to customize.
winner: ChatGPT Canvas
3. Solving mathematical problems
Math is not my strong point and nothing remotely interests me, so I thought it would be a good idea to test out Claude Artifact and ChatGPT Canvas to see if they could help me. I asked both for average salaries and arithmetic mean (I made this information up). ChatGPT gave me the answer in a panel, but I could only use the same editing tools available for writing.
Claude, on the other hand, was much better at explaining; He even got into graphic design. In the end, Claude has to get the point here.
winner: Claude Artifact
4. Design of graphics and charts
For my final test, I wanted Claude Artifact and ChatGPT to design some graphs. I asked them to create graphs from the salary information I had provided them earlier. ChatGPT Canvas did this in about a minute, and it was very simple.
However, I had problems with Claude Artifact. The form crashed and then told me I had run out of free messages. I'm sure my experiences would have been different if I had used a paid plan, but Claude Artifact failed to meet my needs. As a result, I give ChatGPT another point here.
If you don't like the performance of either model when you try them out, you can always create charts using Power BI.
winner: ChatGPT Canvas
Although ChatGPT Canvas easily wins this comparison, I still think Claude Artifact has great potential. It worked well when I asked it to improve certain aspects, even more than ChatGPT did in the past. However, having only a certain number of free messages was quite annoying.
I still recommend trying both models, but ChatGPT is a much better choice for writing and programming in particular. You can now check out advanced ChatGPT alternatives that provide automated application scripting.
Get IPTV Free Trial Now