| IN BRIEF |
|
Microsoft recently revealed the ideal specifications for its Flight Simulator 2024, sparking heated discussions in the simulation enthusiast community. While the company recommends 64GB of system memory, tests show that using 96GB provides a noticeably improved experience. What are the real impacts of these memory differences on the game?
What Rockstar is hiding behind GTA 6's revolutionary engine
The configuration recommended by Microsoft
Microsoft has released specific recommendations for taking full advantage of Flight Simulator 2024. These specifications include a Core i7 14700K processor and an RTX 4080 graphics card. However, it is the 64 GB RAM recommendation that has caught the attention.
This requirement surprised many players. Indeed, the majority of current games are satisfied with 32 GB of RAM, according to the usual recommendations. Yet Flight Simulator seems to defy this norm.
The benefits of 96 GB of RAM
An extensive test was conducted using not only 64 GB, but also 96 GB of RAM. The results are clear: the difference is notable. With 96 GB, the game manages to offer increased fluidity, even in the most demanding situations.
This unexpected shake-up from Microsoft will transform the Windows 11 experience
The numbers speak for themselves. Although the average frame rate increase is only 10%, the minimum performance increases by 31%. This improvement results in a more pleasant and smooth flying experience.
Technical challenges encountered
The test was carried out on a platform including a Ryzen 9 9900X and a GeForce RTX 4070 Ti graphics card. It's not the most powerful setup available, which makes the results even more impressive.
This first Ferrari electric car planned for 2025 promises to shake up the automotive world
To maximize memory usage, some graphics options have been pushed to their limits. This made it possible to see how the game reacts with an increased amount of RAM.
Impacts on connectivity and storage
Another interesting facet is the impact of memory on Internet bandwidth and SSDs. In testing, a peak bandwidth load of 25 Mbps over Wi-Fi was measured with 32 GB of RAM, compared to just 5 Mbps with 64 GB.
The following table summarizes these results:
| RAM (Go) | Load bandwidth (Mbps) | Average SSD Read (MB/s) |
|---|---|---|
| 32 | 25 | 250 |
| 64 | 5 | 250 |
The cost of improvement
While the benefits of using 96GB of RAM are obvious, the cost of this upgrade remains a barrier. The 64 and 96 GB kits are significantly more expensive than the 32 GB kits.
For players looking to improve their experience, however, this investment could be worth it. But this raises the question of whether this upward trend in hardware requirements will continue in the future.
Tests show that Flight Simulator 2024 benefits greatly from using more RAM. However, is the investment really worth it for each player? What does the future hold in terms of specifications for simulation games and other genres?
Source : Pcgamer
Get IPTV Free Trial Now